Proceeding
of 9th Annual Conference
Topic
- Sustainable Technology for Rural Development in Ethiopia
Presenter - Ato Wondimu Deginetu
Chair Person - Ato yeheyes Assefa
Venue - Imperial Hotel, Conference hall
Date and Time - 10:30Am – 11:00Am,
December 18,2004
Rapporters - Ato Feleke Dejene and Ato Getachew
kebede
Opening:
- The chair Person, Ato Yeheyes Assefa, opened
the technical session by explaining briefly about the theme
of the Conference, i.e., ‘’Technology for Rural
Development.’’ He then introduced the paper presenter,
Ato Wondimu Deginetu, to the audience and invited him to present
the paper.
Presentation:
Ato Wondimu Deginetu started his paper by
explaining how Ethiopia is in a very demanding position these
days for an improvement in technologies related to agricultural
and rural development. He also listed out some facts about
rural p[arts of Ethiopia such as:-
• High growth rate of population,
• Insufficient grain production,
• Health problems like HIV/AIDS, and
• Lack of potable water etc.
He mentioned that in order to alleviate these
problems, we must choose and promote appropriate and sustainable
technologies, which can bring quick rural development. These
technologies should:
- Keep up with nature
- Be suitable for use
- Be affordable
- Be easily operated & maintained
- Endure and lay foundation to give chance for new technology
He went on discussing y listing out the intervention
areas of sustainable technologies that could bring quick rural
development. These are:
• Enough grain production to feed the
nation.
• Rural electrification and reforestation through generation
and use of renewable energy development programs such as Wind,
Solar, and Micro hydropower.
• Technologies suitable for supply of potable water
such as water harvesting, hand pumps, etc.
• Supply of affordable clothing by improving national
dress making machines with modern technology and develop export
market.
• Better and economical shelter construction by making
improvement on selection materials and design such as:
o Introducing prefabricated building materials like mud bricks
o Preparing architectural design for wooden/bamboo houses
• Better up keeping & exploitation of live stock,
Bee etc, such as breeding, milk production, butchery, bee
hives, honey extractors, wax making, waste recycling, Improving,
etc.
• Post harvest & agro processing technologies to
reduce the wastage of harvest
• Promoting indigenous and modern health care such as
providing mosquito net, water filters, solar water treatment
plant, refrigerator, traditional games etc.
• Nature & climate preservation technology such
as Rain water and Soil conservation, better charcoal production,
briquette production, better store design, etc.
• Rural mental nourishment and know-how transfer schemes
such Technical & vocational training centers, Farmers
training schemes, mobile schools, mass media, exhibitions,
etc.
He further stated that Networking & performance
evaluation is very essential in order to implement the above
discussed intervention areas of sustained technologies for
rural development.
This can be accomplished by forming National
Organ by Consensus (from private sector, NGO, Government,
etc) and acting through secretariat office, and then all stakeholders
can accept the program development and implementation.
Conclusion
Finally, Ato Wondimu Deginetu, concluded
his presentation by stressing the fact that although there
are proved & Unused appropriate technologies in Ethiopia,
there are problems of management in selecting, implementing
and promoting these technologies. Therefore, the way forward
must be to follow:
Discussion
The chairperson had highlighted important
points of the paper and then gave a chance for
Conference participants to forward questions, comments etc
to the presenter and audience as well.
Accordingly, comments were forwarded, discussed
and common understanding was reached by the participants as
follows:-
1) Government institutions, private entrepreneurs,
NGO assisted projects had tried to develop many improved version
of farm tools, such ‘’ARARSO’’, during
the last 40 years. However, none of them were promoted properly,
manufactured and able to reach the farmer.
• The problems associated with earlier researches were:-
o They were not market oriented
o Purchasing power of farmers is limited
o Networking was almost non-existent
o Inconsistent Government policies
• The present policy allows intervening in this sector.
Hence, we need to join hands to market the improved farm tool,
which would help in increasing an agricultural output.
2) Technologies that are suitable for rural
development (Hardware) are available but it is believed that
the real problem is implementation i.e, lack of ‘’Software’’
(Finance, training, etc).
3) Lack of Networking is believed to be a major set back in
selection & implementation of improved technologies for
rural development.
Hence, ESME shall forward the idea to the
Government and other stakeholders and find a way to solve
the problem i.e., create the ‘’NETWORKING’’.
4) Promoting improved technology for rural
development will not be successful (even if there is sufficient
financing) unless the end user is aware and accepts it. So,
the end user must be part of the technology selection and
implementation process.
5) If at all there should be subsidies for improved technology,
it should not be direct to the end user rather it should be
given to the manufacturer. This would help to reduce the cost
of the improved farm tools, equipment etc.
Closing
The chairperson finally closed the session by pointing out
the fact that “ to go out of the poverty cycle (by improving
technologies for rural development) getting organized is a
must and we need to focus towards networking”.