ABSTRACT
Increased recognition is being placed, both in industry and
in academia, on effective supply chain management. The term
supply chain management presupposes that there exists a supply
chain to be managed. Supply chain management has become a
universal approach to cost effectiveness, timely delivery
and the creation of growth oriented exchange system in goods
and services.
With a focus on supply chain management in
which cost, inventory and time are the key challenges, this
paper develops a model to aid the improvement of performance
of supply chain system. The model is developed based on existing
supply chain management knowledge and the results of an assessment
of logistics and supply chain management on manufacturing
industries in Ethiopia.
In order to make the paper more practical
and realistic, an actual case study was conducted on an existing
brewing factory in Ethiopia, Meta Abo. The factory’s current
performances were compared with the supply chain model developed
and some areas of improvements were identified. Finally, general
procedures were developed in order to facilitate the application
of the model for practical purpose.
1. Introduction
Logistics and supply chain have great importance
to a national economy. The cost of moving products from the
factory to the market place is estimated to account for about
20% of the Gross National Product in the developed world [9].
It is projected to be a greater proportion in the developing
world like Ethiopia, where a large amount of capital is tied
up in inventories and in transportation systems for moving
materials. In order to survive and compete effectively today,
industries must abandon the functional model of management
and operations, and move toward an enterprise and “virtual
supply chain” view. Figure 1 shows an ideal supply chain network
for a typical manufacturing system.
In Ethiopia, the issue of supply chain system is a major area
of economic activities that concerns, directly or indirectly,
private and public institutions, investors, contractors, national
and international organizations as well as the diplomatic
community. In order to alleviate the problem of being unable
to be competent in market and technology, the concept of logistics
and supply chain management is important for the firms. Excellent
industries (where “excellence” translates into market success)
approach their competitive environment through truly enterprise
wide and integrated business process.
Logistics and supply chain process is the
key cross- sectional process of management of materials and
information flow from supplier to customer and vice versa.
Logistics joins sales and sales generation, design, and transformation
as fundamental process of a business.
There are several issues associated to supply
chain management in Ethiopia. Some of the problems associated
with logistics and supply chain management in Ethiopia are:
• Low competitiveness with local and global industries
• Low customer service level
• Longer lead times
• Poor strategic alliance

Figure 1: A Supply Chain Network
2. Literature Review
The concept of supply chain management has
its roots in the 1960s concept of logistics management – a
planning tool that seeks to develop a system–wide, integrated
view of the firm. Subsequently, supply chain management extends
the concept of logistics management to external integration
of the firm. It is conceived as “a series of linked suppliers
and customers” [8].
Supply chain system comprises an interlinked
network of supplies, manufacturers, distributors and customers
whereby material flows from the supplier through manufacturers
and distributors to the customers.
To balance customers' demands with the need
for profitable growth, many companies have moved aggressively
to improve supply chain management. Their efforts reflect
seven principles of supply chain management that can enhance
revenue, cost control, and asset utilization as well as customer
satisfaction. The seven principles of supply chain managements
are: [4]
- Customer segmentation
- Customizing logistics networks
- Demand planning
- Product differentiation
- Sourcing suppliers strategically
- Integration of technology
- Performance measures
Generally, multi-stage models for supply
chain design and analysis can be divided into four categories,
by modeling approach [1]. The four categories are:
- Deterministic Analytical Models, in which the variables
are known and specified,
- Stochastic Analytical Models, where at least one of the
variables is unknown, and is assumed to follow a particular
probability distribution,
- Economic Models and
- Simulation Models.
3. Model Development for Supply Chain
Management System
Because of the inherent complexity of decision
making in supply chains, there is a growing need for modeling
supply chain system with different methodologies. Developing
a supply chain management system requires the analysis of
the flow of materials from the initial sourcing to the final
end customers.
3.1 Development of Material Flow
System
Every manufacturing system has its own material
flow system (MFS) in order to collect raw materials from geographically
dispersed vendors and distribute finished products to customers
at a widely dispersed geographical location. Materials, in
the process of passing through an MFS are either in transit
through various transportation modes, or are waiting in areas,
which may be called stores. Even processing at production
work centers is akin to storage for a period of processing.
Therefore the materials within a material flow system is in
either transit or storage mode. [7]
Figure 3 shows an MFS model for manufacturing
firm. The MFS can therefore be conceptualized as network of
storage nodes (or points), interconnected by a number of movement
pathways.
The MFS can be divided into two subsystems-
supply system (SS) and distribution system (DS) (Figure 2).
In addition to these two physical sub-systems, the MFS has
a third intangible sub-system called the planning system (PS),
whose task is the programming and scheduling of the two physical
sub-systems.

Figure 2: Coupling of Systems
3.2 Analysis of the Model
Supply chain management is primarily concerned
with the utilization of three resources, i.e. costs, inventory
and time.
Terminologies in Model analysis
The following terms were important in analysis
of the model.
a) Nodes
These are essentially storage areas.
There are five different types of nodes which constitute a
supply chain.
• Source Nodes (SN)
• Exit Nodes (EN)
• Mother Node (MN)
• Master Node (MaN)
• Storage Node (StN)
b) Flow paths
These are route/mode combinations between
two nodes through which the material moves (figure 4). Generally
there are two types of flow paths:
• Normal Flow Paths: These are flow paths
along which the movement or flow of material is not impeded
by barriers, which have extra cost and time implications,
in addition to the usual freight and insurance costs.
• Barrier Flow Paths: These are flow paths across which barriers
exist, to impede flow and have additional cost and time implications.
c) Chain link
A chain link is two nodes connected by a flow path. The supply
chain will usually consist of one or more chain links. A complete
nodal representation of typical manufacturing system is shown
in figure 5.

Figure 4: Chain Link
Figure 5: Nodal Representation of Typical Manufacturing Firm.
Figure 3: Model of Material Flow System
of Typical Manufacturing Firm in Ethiopia
3.3 Principles of Model Analysis
Supply chain has three specific techniques
for each of these resources.
i) Supply Chain Costs Analysis (SCCA)
The primary process of material flow through
the MFS involves the expenditure of costs at each and every
node and flow paths of the supply chain. At each node/flow
path, costs incurred due to materials flow fall into one or
more of the following categories.
• Input Node Cost (INC)
• Flow costs (FC)
• Barrier costs (BC)
• Node Activity Costs (NAC)
Once the different cost components have been determined, they
are arranged in matrix form in order to simplify the analysis
as shown in table 1.
Table 1: Matrix for Supply Chain Analysis
Node
No. INC NAC BC FC Total
1
2
.
Total
SCC
For each unique supply chain, a unique supply chain cost can
be defined as:
where ;
= number of input nodes
= number of flow paths
= number of barrier flow paths
= number of intermediate nodes
= number of nodes/ flow paths where is occurred
= input node cost
= flow cost
= barrier cost
= node activity cost
= capital tie- up cost
Note that capital tie-up costs are costs
incurred if material spends more time in the supply chain
than the credit period offered. It is defined as:
where:
= capital tie-up cost at the jth node/ flow path
= the amount of capital (usually the price
to vendor plus any non-credit costs incurred)
= rate of capital cost
= time period at the jth node after credit period has expired
The concept of supply chain cost measures
the total ultimate cost of material to a subject firm arising
due to the particular supply chain in question. It is obvious
that the structure of the supply chain will determine supply
chain cost and any modification of supply chain structure
will affect the supply chain cost.
If represents the cost of the jth supply
chain, then the total supply system cost can be defined as
;
ii) Supply Chain Inventory Analysis
(SCIA)
The basic objective of SCIA is to design
supply chains in consonance with a target level of customer
service and system and supply chain inventories. The optimization
of node/ flow path inventory levels will ensure smooth operations.
Supply chain inventory for supply chain,
can be defined as;
Where;
= inventory at node of the supply chain
= inventory at flow path of the supply chain
= the number of nodes and the number of flow paths respectively
Similarly, the total system inventory is
defined as:
where the supply system consist of supply
chains.
iii) Supply Chain Time Analysis (SCTA)
The supply system has two dimensions for
time associated with each node, flow path and the total system.
Each node and flow path have a characteristic task performance
cycle time associated with them called the node cycle time
for the node and flow path cycle time for the flow path.
Therefore, the supply chain cycle time is
defined as the sum total of time a batch of material takes
to move through the supply chain as follows:
where a supply chain has nodes and flow paths.
Although the performance measurements for
supply chain are cost, inventory and time, under this paper,
more emphasis is given to cost. Concentrating on cost minimization
have direct impact on the other performance measures for supply
chain i.e. inventory turn over rate and supply chain response
time.
3.4 Supply Chain Model Optimization
The model of supply chain can be simplified
with supply chain flow structure as show in figure 6.
Figure 6: Supply Chain Network Structure
i) Sourcing / Suppliers selection
The selection of suppliers with proper allocation
helps the manufacturing firm for proper management of suppliers.
There are a number of factors that have to be considered for
suppliers selections.
Number of vendor per raw materials
Vendor location
Capacity allocation
Local regulation and tax implementation
Local market implication
Local labor and material costs
There are different models and methodologies
used in supply chain decision making. In this paper, linear
programming(LP) techniques are applied in order to aid decision
in supply chain management.
The selection of suppliers and capacity allocation
can be modeled as transportation problem which can be solved
by LP techniques [2].
The mathematical model for transportation
problem can be represented as follows.
Let
Sources of raw materials
Capacity to deliver from source
Raw materials warehouse
Demand of each warehouse
Cost of transporting a unit of raw material from to
Amount delivered from to
the number of sources of raw materials and the number of raw
materials warehouse, respectively
The LP model can be formulated to minimize the overall transportation
cost.
Objective function:
Constraints:
Suppliers constraint
Demand constraint
If the objective functions and the constraints
are properly modeled, one can easily determine the optimum
solution. As a result, the number of raw materials warehouse
required with their proper capacity can also be determined.
Tools like management science and LINDO are available in order
to aid the determination of optimal solution for the problem
like supplier selection and other related problems.
ii) Inbound and Outbound Logistics
One convenient way to view a supply chain
for a single manufacturing firm is to divide its logistics
system into inbound and outbound logistics. Inbound logistics
is a process material flow from suppliers to manufacturers
and outbound logistics is the distribution of finished products
to end users.
There are a number of factors that have to
be considered in inbound and outbound logistics. The following
are key factors where proper decision is important in order
to achieve a good profit margin and to reduce unnecessary
expenses.
Warehouse location
Number of warehouse
Warehouse size and capacity
In- house fleet vs contract carriers
Number of carriers
Local regulations and tax implementation
Warehouse location, number of warehouse and
warehouse size & capacity can be modeled using mathematical
model as follows.
• Inbound logistics
Let
raw material warehouse
the number of raw material warehouse
the capacity of raw material warehouse
the cost of transporting a unit of raw materials from warehouse
to the manufacturing firm.
the demand of the manufacturing firm
The relationship between raw material warehouse and manufacturing
system can be modeled as linear programming model as follows.
Objective function
Constraints:
Note that the model for outbound logistics can be easily obtained
by modifying the model for the outbound logistics.
iii) Manufacturing System
This is the area where raw materials coming
from suppliers are converted into useful products. The key
factors that have to be considered in relation to the manufacturing
firm are: plant location, plant capacity, local labor, material
costs, local economy, and political situations.
4. Evaluation and Application of
the Model
The model can be applied for either the development
of the new supply chain system or for an improvement of the
existing system. As an application for the existing system,
the model is used to evaluate the performance of the existing
system and tries to identify the areas of improvement. On
the other hand, the model can also be applicable for the development
of new supply chain system from scratch by generating different
alternatives.
Figure 7 is a flow diagram showing the procedures
that are important in order to apply the model either for
the existing system or for developing a new system.
Figure 7: Flow Diagram for Application of the SCM Model
4.1 Case Study: Meta Brewery
The main purpose of the case study is to
apply the model and to illustrate the merits and demerits
of the model. To select industries for the application of
the model, a survey of industries like sugar industries, leather
and beverage industries has been undertaken.
4.2 Existing Material Flow Model
Materials used to produce beer are generally
categorized as direct materials and indirect materials. The
direct materials (table 2) are ingredients which are converted
to product through various conversion processes, while the
indirect materials are added in order to facilitate the various
reactions. Under this paper, more attention is given to direct
materials due to their higher impact on the cost of supply
chain system..
Based on the ingredients used to produce
beer, the materials flow system for Meta Brewery can be developed
as shown in the figure 8
Table 2: Raw Materials and the Source of Raw Materials
for the Meta Brewery
Direct Raw Materials Source
Malt Assela Malt Factory
Hops Imported
Various chemicals (yeast, enzymes, etc.) Imported
Water Local spring water
4.3 Cost Analysis Using Supply Chain
Model
The existing costing method at Meta Brewery
is a traditional accounting system which has some drawback
such as double counting and being unable to detect some hidden
costs. Furthermore the traditional costing system works effectively
on the monthly or yearly basis and it is a time dependent
costing method.
Although traditional cost accounting is the
easiest and least complicated of the cost analysis method,
this method of cost analysis typically ignores future liability
costs and considers all indirect costs as overhead or omits
them altogether. These overhead costs, if considered, are
randomly allocated to a process or product based on some measurable,
yet arbitrary parameter (e.g., labor hours, capital equipment
costs). This method is the most common accounting method used
throughout industry.
The stage by stage analysis necessitate by
supply chain cost analysis system models the materials flow
or supply chain process, and reveals hidden material and supply
chain costs which may not be obvious and may be misallocated
by traditional cost accounting system . Supply chain cost
analysis introduces a transparency or clarity which may not
be available to mangers operating under information generated
standard accounting system. During the analysis of cost using
supply chain models, it is better to normalize to a single
unit of measures. Suggested units of measurement are cost/unit
of materials or cost/batch of materials. Since the production
of beer is batch type in nature, a cost/batch of materials
has been selected as a single unit of cost measurement.
The cost component for supply chain system includes INC, NAC,
FC, and BC. In order to use supply chain model for cost analysis,
the existing MFS should have to be modified to the developed
model format as shown in figure 9.
The cost components within the supply chain
system in Meta Brewery can be indicated as shown in figure
10. In order to simplify the analysis further, the material
flow system should have to be converted in the form of nodal
representation as shown in figure 11. As a result, total supply
chain cost for a single batch can be obtained by summing up
the total cost of INC, NAC, BC, and FC. Thus , SCC

The yearly supply chain cost for Meta Brewery can also be
determined by multiplying the single supply chain cost per
batch by the number of batches produced in one year.
4.4 Searching for Improvement
In order to minimize the effort made on the
raw materials, major raw materials which have more impact
on cost of materials can be identified with the aid of principles
of Pareto (ABC analysis). This system can also be applied
for the distribution system.
i) Improvement at Supply System
From the direct raw materials, the cost of
malt is very high as compared to hops and various chemicals;
therefore, concentrating on malt will have major impact on
cost of supply chain system. Currently, the only local supplier
of malt for the factory is Assela Malt Factory (AMF). The
Brewery allocated its own trucks for the purpose of transporting
malt from AMF to Meta Brewery which adds some unnecessary
cost over the factory.
If the delivery of malt to the factory is
contracted to liable third party logistic providers (Transport
Enterprises), the factory can reduce the administration cost
of trucks. Comparing the various costs, if the transport is
done with its own trucks and leased to liable third party
logistics provider, the brewery can have an improvement of
43.83 % in inbound logistics.
ii) Distribution System
In the case of Meta Brewery, the products
of the factory are bottled beer and draught. Bottled beer
has high percentage of share compared to draught.
Here, further analysis should have to be
made to determine potential distribution region. Concentrating
on few regions like Addis Ababa, Tigray and Amhara have major
impact for the improvement of cost of distribution. The other
point that is observed from the distribution system is that,
the factory should have to work more in order to improve the
percentage of distribution of some regions like Oromia, Southern
Nations, Nationalities, and People's (SNNP) and others.
5. Conclusion
A supply chain model used to analyze cost,
inventory and time was developed on the basis of material
flow system of manufacturing firms in Ethiopia. To reduce
the overall supply chain cost, proper integration of supply
chain partners and high customer service level with shorter
lead times is essential.
The case study under this paper reveals that
the developed supply chain model can be applicable in practice.
This model can be used by manufacturing firms in Ethiopia
to improve their performance in supply chain management and
can also be used for firms’ self-assessment.
In order to achieve proper integration within the supply chain
management system, there are a number of factors to be considered.
The basic principle in supply chain management system is the
creation of collaboration and trust in supply chain partners.
To facilitate this collaboration process effectively, the
integration of information technology within the supply chain
partners is essential.
Sharing benefits among supply chain partners
is an important success factor for organization. It is not
good practice to scarify other benefits for gaining more.
Therefore, the benefits should be equally shared within the
supply chain members, in order to have continuous relationship.

Figure 8: Existing Material Flow System
for Meta Brewery

Figure 9: Supply Chain Model for Meta Brewery

Figure 10 : Supply Chain Cost Component
for Meta Brewery

Figure 11: Nodal Representation and Numbering of Nodes for
Meta Brewery
6. References
[1] Benita M. Beamon, Supply Chain Design
and Analysis: Models and Methods, International Journal of
Production Economics, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 281-294, 1998.
[2] Bernard W. Tyloyr , Introduction to Management
Science, fifth edition, Prince Hall , Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey 07632,1996.
[3] Christopher Gopal & Gerard Cahill,
Logistics in Manufacturing, Business on Irwin, 1992.
[4] David et al , The Seven Principles of
Supply Chain Management, Reed Business Information, a division
of Reed Elsevier Inc, January 1997.
[5] Debebe, A., Model Development of Supply
Chain Management System_- A Case Study on Meta Abo Brewery,
Master’s Thesis (Advisor Dr-.Ing. Daniel Kitaw), Addis Ababa
University, 2004
[6] Panos Kouvelis and Meir J. Rosenblatt , A Mathematical
Programming Model to Global Supply Chain Management: Conceptual
Approach and Managerial Insights, Faculty of Industrial Engineering
and Management Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Haifa
32000, Israel, March 2001.
[7] Sergio G. Lazzarini et al , Integrated
Supply chain and network analysis; The study of netcahins,
John M. Olin School of Business, 2000.
[8] Shay B.S., Supply chain Management in
the twenty –first century, Macmillan Indian Limited, 2000.
[9] Tekeste Berhan Habtu, The role of Information
Technology (IT) in logistics in Ethiopia, conference on information
communication technologies and development, Addis Ababa, 18-20
June, 2001.
[10] Teresa(Tong) Wu & Peter O’Grady, A net work Based
Approach to the Design of Supply chains, Internet Lab Technical
Report TR 2001-10, 2000.
[11] Thomas Behlau et al , Modeling and Simulation
of Supply Chains, Department of Logistics and Materials Handling
Engineering, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Germany,1996.
[12] Tjendra Santoso, A Stochastic Programming
Approach for Supply Chain Network Design Under Uncertainty,
Georgia Institute of Technology, 765 Ferst Drive, Atlanta,
GA 30332 ,June 2003.
[13] Yoon Chang and Harris Makatsoris , Supply Chain Modeling
Using Simulation, Institute for Manufacturing, University
of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1RX, UK, I. J. of Simulation
Vol. 2 No. 1.
[14] Y. Wu and G. Freizelle et al, A Simulation
Study on Supply Chain Complexity in Manufacturing Industry,
Institute for Manufacturing , University of Cambridge , Mill
Lane, Cambridge, CB2 1RX, UK,2001.